Poly(aryl ether sulfone) composition and method of making

ABSTRACT

A poly(aryl ether sulfone) comprises units of formula (I): 
     
       
         
         
             
             
         
       
     
     wherein Ar 1  is a divalent C 6 -C 15  aromatic group, Ar 2  is a divalent C 6 -C 15  aromatic group, Ar 3  is a divalent C 6 -C 15  aromatic group, and n is greater than 1; 
     and a terminal group of formula (II) derived from a monofunctional phenoxide 
     
       
         
         
             
             
         
       
     
     wherein is X is a hydrogen atom or an organic substituent having from 1 to 20 carbon atoms; wherein the poly(aryl ether sulfone) has a hydroxyl group content greater than 0 and less than 50 parts per million (ppm), based on the poly(aryl ether sulfone) weight, a glass transition temperature of 180 to 290° C., a weight average molecular weight of 20,000 to 100,000, a halogen content of greater than 0 and less than 3000 ppm based on the poly(aryl ether sulfone) weight. The poly(aryl ether sulfone) can have a thermal stability factor greater than or equal to 90%. The poly(aryl ether sulfone) can have a yellowness index (YI) less than 120 after an article made from the poly(aryl ether sulfone) is exposed to a temperature of 200° C. in ambient air for 28 days. The poly(aryl ether sulfone) is free of methoxy groups. Methods of making the polymer are also disclosed.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a poly(aryl ether sulfone) and a method tosynthesize the poly(aryl ether sulfone).

Poly(aryl ether sulfone)s are typically linear, amorphous, injectionmoldable polymers possessing a number of desirable features such asexcellent high temperature resistance, good electrical properties, andtoughness. Due to their excellent properties, the poly(aryl ethersulfone)s can be used to manufacture a variety of useful articles suchas molded articles, films, sheets, and fibers. Synthesis of poly(arylether sulfones) can be difficult—particularly when trying to controlmolecular weight. Molecular weight control has typically been achievedthrough the rigorous use of stoichiometric amounts but very smallvariations in the relative amounts of the monomers can result insignificant differences in molecular weight. This makes consistentsynthesis in a manufacturing setting difficult. Additionally, thepolymer resulting from stoichiometric control can have a less thandesirable halogen content, primarily resulting from the dihalodiarylsulfone monomer. Furthermore, known, ordinary poly(aryl ether sulfones)can contain methoxy groups and are made with reactive alkylhalide-containing materials such as methyl chloride-materials that canraise regulatory and safety concerns.

For the foregoing reasons, there is a need to develop improved, morerobust synthetic methods that do not employ reactive alkylhalide-containing materials such as methyl chloride-materials andproduce poly(aryl ether sulfones) which are structurally different frompoly(aryl ether sulfones) made using reactive alkyl halide-containingmaterials. Additionally, there is a need to develop a poly(aryl ethersulfone) that can be made without rigorous use of stoichiometric amountsof the monomers needed to make the poly(aryl ether sulfone).Furthermore, there is a need to develop a poly(aryl ether sulfone)having low halogen content.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The aforementioned need is addressed, at least in part, by a poly(arylether sulfone) comprising units of formula (I):

wherein Ar¹ is a divalent C₆-C₁₅ aromatic group, Ar² is a divalentC₆-C₁₅ aromatic group, Ar³ is a divalent C₆-C₁₅ aromatic group and n isgreater than 1;

and a terminal group of formula (II) derived from a monofunctionalphenoxide

wherein is X is a hydrogen atom or an organic substituent having from 1to 20 carbon atoms; further wherein the poly(aryl ether sulfone) has ahydroxyl group content greater than or equal to 0 and less than 50 partsper million (ppm), based on the poly(aryl ether sulfone) weight, a glasstransition temperature of 180 to 290° C., a weight average molecularweight of 20,000 to 100,000, and a halogen content of greater than 0 andless than 3000 ppm based on the poly(aryl ether sulfone) weight. Thepoly(aryl ether sulfone) can have a thermal stability factor greaterthan or equal to 90%. The poly(aryl ether sulfone) can have a yellownessindex (YI) less than 120 after an article made from the poly(aryl ethersulfone) is exposed to a temperature of 200° C. in ambient air for 28days. The poly(aryl ether sulfone) is methoxy free.

Also disclosed herein is a method of making the poly(aryl ether sulfone)comprising reacting a bishydroxy aromatic compound with an aqueousmixture of an alkali metal hydroxide to form a bis salt of thebishydroxy aromatic compound; drying the bis salt of the bishydroxyaromatic compound to form a dry bis salt of the bishydroxy aromaticcompound; reacting the dry bis salt of the bishydroxy aromatic compoundwith a dihalodiaryl sulfone in the presence of an organic solvent, analkali metal carbonate, and a phase transfer catalyst to form thepoly(aryl ether sulfone), wherein a monofunctional phenoxide is addedduring the method in an amount sufficient to result in a poly(aryl ethersulfone) having a halogen content less than 3000 ppm based on thepoly(aryl ether sulfone) weight.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIGS. 1 and 2 graphically represent data presented in the Examples.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

It has been discovered that a monofunctional phenoxide is a highlyeffective terminating agent in poly(aryl ether sulfone) synthesis. Themonofunctional phenoxide has sufficient reactivity to result inapproximately 90 to 100% incorporation in the poly(aryl ether sulfone),based on the total moles of monofunctional phenoxide present.Additionally, little or no side products comprising the monofunctionalphenoxide are detected. Additionally, the use of the monofunctionalphenoxide reduces the halogen content of the poly(aryl ether sulfone).Use of the monofunctional phenoxide relieves the need for tightstoichiometric control of the bis salt of the bishydroxy aromaticcompound and the dihalodiaryl sulfone. Also, advantageously, thepoly(aryl ether sulfones) do not contain methoxy groups and are not madewith reactive alkyl halide-containing materials such as methyl chloride.

In some embodiments the poly(aryl ether sulfone) consists essentially ofunits of formula (I) and terminal groups of formula (II). “Consistsessentially of”, as used in this context, describes a polymer havingless than 10 weight percent, or, more specifically, less than 5 weightpercent, or, even more specifically, less than 3 weight percent, basedon the total weight of the polymer, of units and terminal groups otherthan those described by formulas (I) and (II). In some embodiments thepoly(aryl ether sulfone) consists of units of formula (I) and terminalgroups of formula (II).

In this specification and in the claims, which follow, reference will bemade to a number of terms which shall be defined to have the followingmeanings. The singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” include pluralreferents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. “Optional” or“optionally” means that the subsequently described event or circumstancemay or may not occur, and that the description includes instances wherethe event occurs and instances where it does not.

The term “alkyl” as used in the various embodiments of the presentinvention is intended to designate both linear alkyl, branched alkyl,aralkyl, cycloalkyl, bicycloalkyl, tricycloalkyl and polycycloalkylradicals containing carbon and hydrogen atoms, and optionally containingatoms in addition to carbon and hydrogen, for example atoms selectedfrom Groups 15, 16 and 17 of the Periodic Table. The term “alkyl” alsoencompasses that alkyl portion of alkoxide groups. In variousembodiments normal and branched alkyl radicals are those containing from1 to about 32 carbon atoms, and include as illustrative non-limitingexamples C₁-C₃₂ alkyl optionally substituted with one or more groupsselected from C₁-C₃₂ alkyl, C₃-C₁₅ cycloalkyl or aryl; and C₃-C₁₅cycloalkyl optionally substituted with one or more groups selected fromC₁-C₃₂ alkyl. Some particular illustrative examples comprise methyl,ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, sec-butyl, tertiary-butyl, pentyl,neopentyl, hexyl, heptyl, octyl, nonyl, decyl, undecyl and dodecyl. Someillustrative non-limiting examples of cycloalkyl and bicycloalkylradicals include cyclobutyl, cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl, methylcyclohexyl,cycloheptyl, bicycloheptyl and adamantyl. In various embodiments aralkylradicals are those containing from 7 to about 14 carbon atoms; theseinclude, but are not limited to, benzyl, phenylbutyl, phenylpropyl, andphenylethyl. In various embodiments aryl radicals used in the variousembodiments of the present invention are those substituted orunsubstituted aryl or heteroaryl radicals containing from 6 to 18 ringcarbon atoms. Some illustrative non-limiting examples of these arylradicals include C₆-C₁₅ aryl optionally substituted with one or moregroups selected from C₁-C₃₂ alkyl, C₃-C₁₅ cycloalkyl or aryl. Someparticular illustrative examples of aryl radicals comprise substitutedor unsubstituted phenyl, biphenyl, toluyl and naphthyl. Heteroarylgroups comprise those containing from about 3 to about 10 ring carbonatoms, and include, but are not limited to, triazinyl, pyrimidinyl,pyridinyl, furanyl, thiazolinyl and quinolinyl. Aryl halides that arevery active to reaction are also included. Examples of such materialsinclude 3,4-dinitrochlorobenzene, 3,4-dinitrofluorobenzene,2-fluoro-benzenesulfonamide, and 4-fluorobenzenesulfonamide.

The term “methoxy free” means that the polymer, at least, has structuralunits of Formula (I) that do not contain methoxy terminal groups andpreferably that the entire polymer does not contain any methoxy groups(structural units of formula (I) and the polymer's backbone do not haveany methoxy groups).

As discussed above the poly(aryl ether sulfone) comprises structuralunits of formula (I) and a terminal group of formula (II). Structuralgroups of formula (I) are derived from a bishydroxy aromatic compoundand a dihalodiaryl sulfone. Exemplary bishydroxy aromatic compounds areHO—Ar¹—OH wherein Ar¹ is defined as mentioned above. Exemplarybishydroxy compounds are represented by the formula (III):

wherein A¹ represents an aromatic group including, but not limited to,phenylene, biphenylene, naphthylene, and the like. In some embodiments Emay be an alkylene or alkylidene group having up to 3 carbons including,methylene, ethylene, ethylidene, propylene, propylidene, andisopropylidene. Additionally, E can be sulfur, SO, SO², or oxygen. Y¹independently at each occurrence may be an inorganic atom including, butnot limited to, halogen (fluorine, bromine, chlorine, iodine); aninorganic group containing more than one inorganic atom including, butnot limited to, nitro; an organic group including, but not limited to, amonovalent hydrocarbon group including, but not limited to, alkenyl,allyl, alkyl, aryl, aralkyl, alkaryl, or cycloalkyl, or an oxy groupincluding, but not limited to, OR² wherein R² is a monovalenthydrocarbon group including, but not limited to, alkyl, aryl, aralkyl,alkaryl, or cycloalkyl with the proviso that the oxy group is not amethoxy group; it being only necessary that Y¹ be inert to andunaffected by the reactants and reaction conditions used to prepare thepolymer. In some particular embodiments Y¹ comprises a halo group orC₁-C₃ alkyl group. The letter “m” represents any integer from andincluding zero through the number of replaceable hydrogens on A¹available for substitution; and the parameter “t” represents an integergreater than or equal to one. The parameters “s” and “u” can be zero oran integer greater than or equal to 1. When “s” is zero and “u” is onethen a single bond connects the two A¹ groups. The definitions of thechemical variable in formula (III) are chosen so as to be consistentwith the definition of Ar¹ in formula (I). The poly(aryl ether sulfone)can be a homopolymer or a copolymer.

In bishydroxy aromatic monomers of formula (III) above, when more thanone Y¹ substituent is present, they may be the same or different. Thepositions of the hydroxyl groups and Y¹ on the aromatic nuclear residuesA¹ can be varied in the ortho, meta, or para positions and the groupingscan be in vicinal, asymmetrical or symmetrical relationship, where twoor more ring carbon atoms of the aromatic residue are substituted withY¹ and hydroxyl groups. Exemplary monomers include 4,4′-bisphenol,bisphenol A and combinations thereof.

As mentioned above structural units of formula (I) are derived from abishydroxy aromatic compound and a dihalodiaryl sulfone. Exemplarydihalodiaryl sulfones are X—Ar²—SO₂—Ar³—X wherein Ar² and Ar³ aredefined as mentioned above and X is a halogen. A wide variety ofdihalodiarylsulfone monomers may be used to prepare the poly(aryl ethersulfone). Typically, sulfone-containing structural units are derivedfrom a dihalodiarylsufone monomer which bears halogen substituentsreactive towards displacement by phenoxide moieties (e.g. the phenoxidemoieties present in the disodium salt of the bishydroxy aromaticcompound). In some embodiments dihalodiarylsulfone comprises at leastone of a dichloro- or a difluorodiaryl sulfone. In some embodiments thedihalodiarylsulfone comprises a dihalodiphenylsulfone. In someembodiments the dihalodiarylsulfone comprises a4,4′-dihalodiarylsulfone, Illustrative examples of4,4′-dihalodiarylsulfones include 4,4′-dichlorodiphenylsulfone,4,4′-difluorodiphenylsulfone, 4,4′-bis(4-chlorophenyl sulfonyl)biphenyland 4,4′-bis(4-fluorophenyl sulfonyl)biphenyl. Without being bound bytheory it is believed that the halogen found in the poly(aryl ethersulfone) originates in the dihalodiaryl sulfone.

The terminal group of formula (II) is derived from a monofunctionalphenol. The term “monofunctional phenol” is defined herein as a phenylgroup with a single hydroxyl group. The phenyl group may be furthersubstituted with an organic substituent having 1 to 20 carbon atoms.Exemplary monofunctional phenols include phenol, p-t-butyl-phenol,m-t-butyl-phenol, 4-hydroxybenzamide, 4-phenoxyphenol,4-hydroxy-N,N-dimethylbenzamide, 4-ethynylphenol,4-tert-butyl-2-methylphenol, 4-(2-phenylpropan-2-yl)phenol,(4-hydroxyphenyl)(phenyl)methanone, methyl 4-hydroxybenzoate,4-(2,4-dimethylheptan-3-yl)phenol, para cumyl phenol, 4-phenyl phenol,para methyl phenol, para nonylphenols, o-t-butyl phenol, hydroxy benzoicacid esters, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments themonofunctional phenol is selected from the group consisting of phenol,para cumyl phenol, 4-phenyl phenol, and combinations thereof.

The terminal group of formula (II) can be present in an amount of 1 mol% to 10 mol %, based on the total number of moles of sulfone groupspresent in the polymer.

The poly(aryl ether sulfone) is made in a reaction mixture comprisingalkali metal salt of a bishydroxy aromatic compound (the bis salt of thebishydroxy compound), alkali metal salt of the monofunctional phenol(the monofunctional phenoxide), and a dihalodiarylsulfone monomer, anorganic solvent and at least one phase transfer catalyst (hereinaftersometimes “PTC”). The alkali metal salt of the bishydroxy aromaticcompound is typically a sodium or potassium salt. Sodium salts are oftenused by reason of their availability and relatively low cost. In oneembodiment, the salts are formed by contacting a bishydroxy aromaticcompound with an alkali metal carbonate. In another embodiment, thesalts are formed by contacting bishydroxy aromatic compounds with analkali metal hydroxide.

The organic solvent has low polarity. The solvent can have a boilingpoint above about 150° C. in order to facilitate the polymerizationreaction, which typically requires temperatures of about 125° C. toabout 250° C. Suitable solvents of this type include, but are notlimited to, ortho-dichlorobenzene, para-dichlorobenzene,dichlorotoluene, 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, diphenyl sulfone, phenetole,anisole and veratrole, and mixtures thereof. In some embodiments theorganic solvent forms an azeotrope with water. In some embodiments theorganic solvent is ortho-dichlorobenzene.

The alkali metal carbonate can be present in an amount of greater than 0to 10 weight percent, based on the total weight of the reaction mixture.In another embodiment, the alkali metal carbonate is present in anamount greater than 0 to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9 weight %. In anotherembodiment, the alkali metal carbonate is used in an amount greater than0 to 1.5 weight percent. In some embodiments the alkali metal carbonateis potassium carbonate.

Suitable phase transfer catalysts include those that are substantiallystable at temperatures required to effect reaction to make the poly(arylether sulfone)s. Substantially stable in the present context means thatthe PTC is sufficiently stable at the temperatures needed to effect thedesired polymerization reaction at a synthetically useful reaction rate.Different types of phase transfer catalysts may be employed. Theyinclude quaternary phosphonium salts of the type disclosed in U.S. Pat.No. 4,273,712; N-alkyl-4-dialkylaminopyridinium salts of the typedisclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,460,778 and 4,595,760; and guanidiniumsalts of the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,081,298, 5,116,975 and5,132,423. Exemplary phase transfer catalysts, by reason of theirexceptional stability at high temperatures and their effectiveness toproduce high molecular weight aromatic polyether polymers in high yield,comprise alpha-omega-bis(pentaalkylguanidinium)alkane salts andhexaalkylguanidinium salts. Hexaalkylguanidinium salts include, but arenot limited to, hexaalkylguanidinium halides and especiallyhexaalkylguanidinium chlorides. Methods for employing guanidinium saltsas catalysts are disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,229,482. Ina particular embodiment a catalyst comprising hexaethylguanidiniumchloride is employed.

The catalyst can be present in an amount of about 0.5 mole percent toabout 10 mole percent based on the total amount of alkali metal salt.The total amount of alkali metal salt is defined herein as the totalamount of the salts of the bishydroxy aromatic compounds employed.Within this range the catalyst can be present in an amount of about 1mole percent to about 4 mole percent, or, more specifically, about 2mole percent to about 4 mole percent.

The molar amount of the dihalodiarylsulfone is generally at leastequivalent to and preferably in excess of the combined molar amounts ofthe bis salt of the bishydroxy compound and the monofunctionalphenoxide. More particularly, the dihalodiarylsulfone:total bis salt andmonofunctional phenoxide molar ratio is generally 1:0.96 to 1:1. Inpractice, it is understood that calculated excesses may be subject tosome variability due to separation (fractionation) of the solvent fromthe suspension of the bisphenolate, as may be evidenced by comparing thepolymer's actual degree of polymerization that is obtained versus thedegree of polymerization that is predicted by the formula:

DP=1+R/(1−R),

where

R=N _(AA)/(N _(BB)+2N _(B))

where R is the molar ratio of the phenoxide to chloride monomers used tomake the polymer (without a chain stopper), DP is the degree ofpolymerization, N_(AA) is the number of moles of dihalodiarylsulfonemonomer, N_(BB) is the number of moles of the bis salt of the bishydroxyaromatic compound, and N_(B) is the number of moles of themonofunctional phenoxide.

The polymerization reaction temperature can be about 125° C. to about250° C. Within this range the temperature can be greater than or equalto 170° C. Also within this range the temperature can be less than orequal to 185° C.

In one embodiment, the reagents employed: the phase transfer catalyst,the alkali metal salt of the bishydroxy aromatic compound, thedihalodiarylsulfone, monofunctional phenoxide, and the solvent, aresubstantially dry. In the present context “substantially dry” means thatthe reaction mixture comprising the said reactants contains at mostabout 100 ppm by weight of water. In some particular embodiments theamount of water in the reaction mixture is less than about 50 ppm, andin still other embodiments less than about 20 ppm. The proportion ofwater may be determined by any convenient means and is typicallydetermined by Karl Fischer coulometric titration. In some embodimentsthe amount of water in the reaction mixture is determined indirectly bymeasuring water content of an over-head distillate or condensate. Drycatalyst may be employed which means that the catalyst contains lessthan about 100 ppm water, or, more specifically, less than about 50 ppmwater, or, even more specifically, less than about 30 ppm water.

Accordingly, the method for preparing the poly(aryl ether sulfone) cancomprise reacting a bis hydroxyl aromatic compound with an aqueousmixture of an alkali metal hydroxide, thereby forming a bis salt of thebishydroxy aromatic compound. The bis salt is then dried to form asubstantially dry bis salt (i.e, having a water content less than orequal to 100 ppm, or, more specifically, less than or equal to 50 ppm,based on the total weight of the bis salt). The bis salt is then reactedwith a dihalodiaryl sulfone in the presence of an organic solvent and aphase transfer catalyst. Monofunctional phenoxide is added to thereaction in an amount sufficient to result in a poly(aryl ether sulfone)having a halogen content less than or equal to 3000 ppm, based on thetotal weight of the poly(aryl ether sulfone). In some embodiments, amonofunctional phenol or monofunctional phenoxide is added to thereaction of the bishydroxy aryl compound and the alkali metal hydroxide.In some embodiments the monofunctional phenoxide is added afterformation of the poly(aryl ether sulfone).

The reaction mixture has a solids content of greater than 0 to less than30 weight percent, based on the weight of the poly(aryl ether sulfone),after the poly(aryl ether sulfone has formed. The solids content can begreater than 0 and less than or equal to 25 weight percent. In oneembodiment the solids content is 20 to 25 weight percent. In anotherembodiment, the solids content ranges from greater than 0 to an upperrange selected from the group of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12,13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, and 25 weight percent.

Following the achievement of a desired molecular weight thepolymerization reaction may be quenched by addition of a quenchingagent. Suitable quenching agents typically comprise at least one acidiccompound, said acidic compound being in solid, liquid, gaseous, orsolution form. Suitable acids include organic acids, particularlycarboxylic acids such as acetic acid, malic acid, oxalic acid, and thelike. Suitable acids also include inorganic acids such as phosphorousacid, phosphoric acid, polyphosphoric acid, hypophosphorous acid,sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, anhydrous hydrochloric acid, and thelike. A gaseous acid, such as anhydrous hydrochloric acid, can bebubbled into the mixture through a sparger or delivered as a solution ina convenient solvent such as the same organic solvent as used inpolymerization reaction. Mixtures comprising at least two acids may alsobe employed.

The amount of quenching agent used is an amount sufficient to end thepolymerization reaction. In particular embodiments the amount of acidquenching agent used is at least sufficient to react with the calculatedamount of phenoxide end-groups that will be present for a givenmolecular weight of poly(aryl ether sulfone) product. “Phenoxide endgroups” as used herein refers to the end groups that result from the bissalt of the bishydroxy aromatic compound; this term does not refer tothe end groups which result from the monofunctional phenoxide.Preferably the quantity of acid added is greater than the calculatedamount and more preferably about twice the calculated amount ofphenoxide end-groups that will be present for a given molecular weightof poly(aryl ether sulfone) product. The acid may be added using anyconvenient protocol. In some embodiments the amount of acid added is ina range of between about 0.02 to about 0.21 millimoles (mmol) acid pergram of polymer or between about 0.07 to about 0.21 mmol acid per gramof polymer.

The poly(aryl ether sulfone)s may be isolated by conventional methods.These include, but are not limited to, one or more steps of saltagglomeration, filtration, washing with water, solvent removal,precipitation, drying and the like. In some embodiments a reactionmixture comprising poly(aryl ether sulfone) is combined with anon-solvent for the poly(aryl ether sulfone) to effect precipitation ofthe polymer. In another embodiment the polymer can be isolated by stepswhich comprise total devolatilization, for example in a devolatilizingextruder.

The poly(aryl ether sulfone) has a hydroxyl group (OH) content ofgreater than or equal to 0 and less than or equal to 50 ppm, based onthe weight of the poly(aryl ether sulfone). Within this range thehydroxyl group content can be less than or equal to 30 ppm, or, morespecifically, less than or equal to 20 ppm, which is the current limitof detection. The poly(aryl ether sulfone) can have an OH contentranging from more than 0 to a member selected from the group of 1, 2, 3,4, 5 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23,24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41,42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, and less than or equal to 50 ppm.

The poly(aryl ether sulfone has a glass transition temperature (Tg) of180 to 290° C. Within this range the glass transition temperature can be215 to 285° C., specifically, 220 to 225° C., more specifically 220 toan upper range selected from the group of 221, 222, 223, 224, and 225.The glass transition temperature is determined by differential scanningcalorimetry (DSC).

As noted, the poly(aryl ether sulfone) has a weight average molecularweights (Mw) of at least 20,000 to 100,000 grams per mole. Within thisrange the weight average molecular weight can be greater than or equalto 40,000. Also within this range the weight average molecular weightcan be less than or equal to 60,000. Weight average molecular weights(M_(w)) are measured by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) versuspolystyrene standards and are expressed in grams per mole.

The poly(aryl ether sulfone) has a halogen content greater than 0 andless than or equal to 3000 ppm, based on poly(aryl ether sulfone)weight. Within this range the halogen content can be greater than orequal to 900, or, greater than or equal to 1500. Also within this rangethe halogen content can be less than or equal to 2500, or, less than orequal to 1500, or, less than or equal to 900, or, less than or equal to500 ppm. In other embodiments, the halogen content can be greater than 0and less than 400 ppm, more than 0 and less than 300 ppm, more than 0and less than 200 ppm, more than 0 and less than 100 ppm, and more than0 and less than 50 ppm. The halogen is selected from the groupconsisting of chlorine, bromine, iodine, fluorine and combinationsthereof. In some embodiments the halogen is chlorine.

The poly(aryl ether sulfone) can have a thermal stability factor that isgreater than or equal to 90%, or, greater than or equal to 95%. Thermalstability factor is defined as the retention of molecular weight, inpercentage terms, after exposure to air at 200° C. for 28 days. Thus ifan amorphous polymer retains 90% of its original molecular weight afterbeing exposed to air at 200° C. for 28 days then the polymer has athermal stability factor of 90%.

Articles made from the poly(aryl ether sulfone) can have a yellownessindex (YI) of less than 120 after being exposed to air at a temperatureof 200° C. for 28 days.

The poly(aryl ether sulfone) described herein is an amorphousthermoplastic. The term “amorphous,” when used to define the poly(arylether sulfone) means that the poly(aryl ether sulfone) does not exhibita crystalline melting peak when the poly(aryl ether sulfone) issubjected to a Differential Scanning calorimeter (DSC) at 20° C./minuteramp rate.

The terminal groups of formula (II) are present in an amount of 1 to 10mol %, based on the total moles of sulfone (SO₂) groups in the poly(arylether sulfone). Within this range the amount of terminal groups can begreater than or equal to 1 and less than or equal to 2, 3, 4, or 5.

As such, it can be useful and convenient to employ an additional chaintermination agent, to limit the molecular weight of the productpoly(aryl ether sulfone). Thus, reaction mixtures used in thepreparation of poly(aryl ether sulfone)s may optionally comprise atleast one chain termination agent in addition to the monofunctionalphenoxide of formula (II). Suitable chain termination agents include,but are not limited to, all those comprising a single activatedsubstituent capable of being displaced by a phenoxide moiety derivedfrom the bis salt of the bishydroxy aromatic compound during thepolymerization process thereby end-capping the polymer chain. In variousembodiments suitable chain termination agents include, but are notlimited to, alkyl halides such as alkyl chlorides, and aryl halidesincluding, but not limited to, chlorides of formulas (VIII):

wherein the chlorine substituent is in the 3- or 4-position, and Z³ is asubstituted or unsubstituted alkyl or aryl group. Suitable chaintermination agents encompassed by generic formula (VIII) include2-chlorobenzophenone, 4-chlorobenzophenone, 2-chlorophenyl phenylsulfone, 4-chlorophenyl phenyl sulfone (CAS Registry No. 80-00-2) andthe like. Other suitable chain-termination agents comprise activatedphthalimides, illustrative examples of which include, but are notlimited to, chloro-N-arylphthalimides, chloro-N-alkylphthalimides,3-chloro-N-phenylphthalimide, 4-chloro-N-phenylphthalimide,3-chloro-N-methylphthalimide and 4-chloro-N-methylphthalimide. Mixturescomprising two or more chain termination agents can also be used.

Advantageously, the method and composition described herein providespreviously unavailable benefits. The poly(aryl ether sulfone) is notmade with reactive alkyl halide-containing materials such as methylchloride-materials. The poly(aryl ether sulfone) described herein arestructurally different from known poly(aryl ether sulfones). Thepoly(aryl ether sulfone) described herein can be made without rigoroususe of stoichiometric amounts of the monomers needed to make thepoly(aryl ether sulfone). The poly(aryl ether sulfone) has low halogencontent. The poly(aryl ether sulfone) exhibits a combination ofproperties that are useful and beneficial.

The composition and method are further illustrated by the followingnon-limiting examples.

EXAMPLES

The purpose of these examples was to evaluate the use of amonofunctional phenoxide as a terminating agent and how the use ofmonofunctional phenoxide affects the halogen content, e.g., chlorinecontent, color thermal stability, haze, molecular weight, and molecularweight retention of poly(aryl ether sulfones). The examples used thematerials shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1 Material Description Source p-Cumyl phenol sodium Suspendedalkali salt in o- Para-cumyl phenol was salt dichlorobenzenemanufactured by SABIC-IP and converted to the sodium salt using themethod described below 4,4′-biphenol disodium Dialkali salt suspended ino- 4,4′-biphenol was manufactured by salt dichlorobenzene Melog andconverted to the disodium salt using the method described belowBisphenol-A disodium Dialkali salt suspended in o- 4,4′-bisphenol A wasmanufactured salt dichlorobenzene by Hexion and converted to thedisodium salt using the method described below 4,4′- Solid, used asreceived Ganesh Polychem dichlorodiphenylsulfone o-dichlorobenzeneLiquid, contained less than Fisher Scientific (ODCB) 20 ppm H₂OHexaethylguanidinium Solution in o- Made as described below chloridedichlorobenzene Potassium carbonate Oven dried solid used as Armandreceived. BASF P3010 PPSU pellets, used as received BASF BASF 94956367J0PPSU pellets, used as received BASF BASF 86663867J0 PPSU pellets, usedas received BASF BASF Ultrason E 2010 PES, used as received BASF SolvayUdel PSU pellets, used as received Solvay Solvay M10297T PPSU pellets,used as received Solvay Solvay M10082J PPSU pellets, used as receivedSolvay Solvay Oct. 27, 2007 PPSU pellets, used as received Solvay SolvayR5100NT AM667 PPSU pellets, used as received Solvay Solvay R5800 PPSUpellets, used as received Solvay Solvay R5000 old PPSU pellets, used asreceived Solvay Solvay R5500 Black PPSU pellets, used as received SolvaySolvay M07187T PPSU pellets, used as received Solvay Jida PPSU PPSUpellets, used as received Jida/Degussa U2 SLT 77-79 Polyetherimidepellets, used as SABIC received

Techniques and Procedures

Preparation of hexaethylguanidinium chloride in o-dichlorobenzene:Prepared in a manner according to U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,435.

Preparation of 4,4′-biphenol disodium salt: A 2 liter three-neckround-bottomed flask was equipped with two thermometer adapters modifiedwith a rubber septum—one of which was penetrated by a stainless steelneedle supplying nitrogen and another sealing a glass siphon tubeconnected to a peristaltic pump by Masterflex Chem-Durance® tubing. Thethird neck was fitted with a water-cooled condenser sealed by oilbubbler. The flask contained a magnetic stirrer. 1550 milliliters ofFisher Optima® methanol was added and degassed with nitrogen bysubmerged needle for 30 minutes. Biphenol (93.0991 g, 0.5 mol) wascharged to the flask with a slight nitrogen purge and the mixture wasallowed to degas for an additional 10 minutes. A 1N sodium hydroxideAcculute (1 mol) was added to the mixture through a neck with sufficientnitrogen purge to prevent entry of oxygen and was stirred at roomtemperature for 30 minutes. An exotherm was observed. Separately, 500milliliters of o-dichlorobenzene was added to a 1 liter three-neckedround-bottomed flask equipped with a Dean-Stark trap (wrapped with heattape) with graham condenser attached and connected to an oil bubbler atthe top of the condenser, Teflon stopper equipped to the middle neck,magnetic stirrer, and a modified thermometer adapter supplying nitrogenwas added to the third neck. A needle with nitrogen supply degassed theo-dichlorobenzene and flask for 30 minutes prior to being heated to 150°C. The methanolic solution was dripped into the o-dichlorobenzene at arate of about 1 drop/second with a peristaltic pump (approximately 3 to5 milliliters/minute). The disodium salt precipitated upon addition tothe hot o-dichlorobenzene and the added methanol and water was removedvia distillation. Upon completion 250 milliliters of additional degassedODCB was added to the salt suspension and was dried by azeotropicdistillation at reflux until the distillate contained less than 20 ppmwater. Typically, salt suspensions were allowed to cool overnight whilestirring which helped to decrease the particle size of the biphenoldisodium salt.

The salt suspension was transferred to a dry box maintained under anitrogen atmosphere where it was poured into a 1 liter glass jar,homogenized by a hand held homogenizer and was left stirring undernitrogen by magnetic stir bar.

Preparation of p-cumyl phenol sodium salt: same as described forbiphenol salt preparation but with use of p-cumyl phenol and 1equivalent of NaOH per mol of p-cumyl phenol.

Preparation of bisphenol-A disodium salt: same as described for biphenolsalt preparation but with use of bisphenol-A and 2 equivalents of NaOHper mol of bisphenol-A.

Potentiometric titration of phenolic salts: Phenolate percent solidswere measured by potentiometric titration with a Mettler-Toledo DL70equipped with an auto sampler. Samples were titrated with 0.1N or 1.0NHCl standardized with tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (THAM). 0.5 gram-1gram of stirred salt suspension was added to a cup and dissolved in 40milliliters of a 50/50 (v/v) mix of methanol/water diluent. HCl wastitrated past the endpoint, and the 1^(st) derivative curve was used toidentify exact endpoint for % solids determination. Procedure wasrepeated three times and then the results were averaged.

Laboratory polymerizations were performed by the following procedure. Ina nitrogen atmosphere, a 3-neck 250 milliliter flask was charged withsolid 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone, 5 wt % suspension of p-cumyl phenolsodium salt in o-dichlorobenzene, suspension of bisphenol-A disodiumsalt in o-dichlorobenzene, suspension of 4,4′-biphenol disodium salt ino-dichlorobenzene, solid K₂CO₃ and dry o-dichlorobenzene. Allsuspensions were individually measured for phenoxide content bypotentiometric titration with 0.1N HCl in 50%(v/v) MeOH/H₂O.Additionally attached to the flask were a modified thermometer adapterwith septa, a glass rod with Teflon blade, and a Dean Stark trap withTeflon stopper. Nitrogen was supplied to the flask by a stainless steelneedle through the septum and the stopper replaced by a water-cooledcondenser when placed in a fume hood. Heat was supplied by a temperaturecontrolled oil bath at 200° C. and the contents were azeotropicallydried by removal of o-dichlorobenzene until collected overheads werebelow 20 ppm H₂O by Karl Fischer titration and the desired reactionsolids, typically 25-28% polymer, were reached. A 20 wt % solution ofcatalyst (hexaethylguanadinium chloride) in o-dichlorobenzene, typically4 mol % with respect to dichlorodiphenyl sulfone, was slowly added tothe flask by syringe through the septum. Additional catalyst was addedif the reaction did not initiate. Upon reaction initiation, an exothermand a color change were observed and molecular weight built immediately.Molecular weight was monitored by gel permeation chromatography andadjustments were made with suspended bisphenol-A salt ino-dichlorobenzene (in the amounts shown in Table 6) until targetmolecular weight was achieved.

After reaching molecular weight target, the polymer was quenched with anexcess of 85% H₃PO₄ at 160° C. and diluted to 10% solids with regard tothe polymer with o-dichlorobenzene. The reaction mixture was cooled andmixed with 100 milliliters of dichloromethane, washed twice with anequal volume of deionized water to volume of solvent, and the organicphase was then precipitated into an equal volume of hexanes and placedin a vacuum oven at 130° C. at full vacuum for 24 hours.

Halogen Detection Techniques: to determine the amount of chlorinepresent in the polymer, the following techniques were used.

Analysis 1: Lab samples and commercial samples were used as received.

Analysis 2: A 10 wt % solution of polymer was made in veratrole(o-dimethoxybenzene) and heated to 170° C. for complete dissolution ofthe polymer. Sample was allowed to completely cool before the polymersolution was precipitated in a Waring 1 liter blender containing 300milliliters of methanol. The polymer was isolated by vacuum filtrationand allowed to air dry before being placed in a vacuum oven at fullvacuum at 150° C. overnight.

The chlorine (halogen) content of the polymer was determined bymeasuring the total chlorine content of the sample and the extractablechlorine content of the sample. The difference between the totalchlorine content and the extractable chlorine content is defined as thepolymer chlorine content.

Total chlorine content was measured using a Parr bomb. 0.2-0.4 grams ofsample was placed into a combustion cup. Powder samples were pressedinto a pellet. 10 milliliters of deionized water was added to the bottomof the Parr Bomb. Ignition wires were placed in the Parr Bomb head sothat the wire ends were 5 to 7 millimeters above the combustion cup. 400microliters of butanol was added to the combustion cup. The Parr bombwas purged with oxygen for 15 to 30 seconds at 5 atmospheres of pressureand was slowly pressurized to approximately 30 atmospheres of oxygen.The Parr bomb was placed in a water bath and ignited for approximately 5seconds. The apparatus was allowed to cool for 20 to 30 minutes removedfrom bath, and dried. 10 milliliters of deionized (DI) water was addedthrough a relief valve. The contents were transferred into a 50milliliter volumetric. The bomb and bomb head were rinsed with DI waterand poured into the volumetric. The volumetric was then filled to theline with DI water as needed. A blank was combusted and analyzed foreach set of samples analyzed and was performed as written above withoutthe addition of polymer to the system.

Extractable chlorine was determined by the following method. 2.5 (±0.5)grams of sample was weighed into a 2 ounce glass sample bottle. Thesample weight was recorded on the bottle. 20 milliliters of methylenechloride or appropriate organic solvent was added. The sample was shakenuntil dissolved, but not less than 30 minutes. 15 milliliters of DIwater was added and shaken for a minimum of 30 minutes to extract theions from the sample. The sample was allowed to separate. If the aqueouslayer was not clear then the sample was centrifuged for approximately 5minutes. The aqueous layer was transferred into an ion chromatography(IC) vial. The sample was filtered if necessary using a 0.2 micrometerdisposable syringe filter. A blank was prepared using all the precedingsteps except for adding the sample to the sample bottle.

The instrumental setup is shown below:

Instrument: Dionex ICS-2000 Ion Chromatography

Column: AS 11 Analytical column

-   -   AG11-HC Guard column

CR-A Trap column

ASRS 300 4 mm Suppressor

Column Temp: 35° C.

Detector: DS6 heated Conductivity detector

Suppressor current: 150 milliAmperes

Injection volume: 100 microliters

Gradient: 0-9 minutes; ramps from 2.5 mM KOH to 4.0 mM KOH

-   -   9-13 minutes; ramps from 4.0 mM KOH to 25.0 mM KOH    -   13-27 minutes; 5.0 mM KOH

Flow rate: 1.5 milliliters/minute

Runtime: 27 minutes

Software: Chromeleon data software

Molecular Weight Measurement Technique: 500 milligrams of polymer wasweighed in a 4 dram vial and 10 milliliters of 10% hexafluoro 2-propanolin methylene chloride (v/v) was added by glass pipette and shaken untilthe polymer dissolved. Molecular weights were determined by GPC analysiswith a Waters 2695 Separations Module equipped with a Polymer Labs Plgel5 micrometer MIXED-C column and Waters 2487 PDA detector at 254 nmElution was effected with an isocratic solvent system of dichloromethaneat 1 milliliter/minute and Mw was reported relative to polystyrenestandards obtained from Polymer Labs. Each sample was run for 15 minuteswith an injection volume of 5 microliters.

Hydroxyl terminal group (also referred to as “end group”) determination:225 milligrams of polymer was combined with 4 milliliters of 0.5Mchromium acetylacetonate in chloroform having a known concentration ofinternal standard. The sample was shaken to dissolve the polymer. Oncedissolved, the solution was treated with an excess of 1,2-phenylenephosphorochlorodite and transferred immediately to a 5 or 10 millimeterNMR tube and P31NMR shifts are recorded with f=>300 MHz, pulse width or35°, 32 k or 64 k data points, 1.8 sec delay and 1600-2500 scans.

The ppm of hydroxyl end groups was calculated by:

$\frac{{Weight}\mspace{14mu} {of}\mspace{14mu} {Standard}}{{Molecular}\mspace{14mu} {weight}{\mspace{11mu} \;}{of}\mspace{14mu} {Standard}}X\frac{{Integral}\text{-}{OH}}{{Integral}\mspace{14mu} {Standard}}X\; 17X\frac{1}{{{weight}\mspace{14mu} {of}\mspace{14mu} {polymer}\mspace{14mu} {taken}}\;}X\frac{4\mspace{14mu} {ml}}{100\mspace{14mu} {ml}}X\; 10^{6}$

Methoxy end group determination: 30-50 milligrams of polymer was addedto approximately 1.2 milliliters of deuterated chloroform or a 10:1solution of deuterated chloroform to deuterated hexafluroisopropanol,and shaken to dissolve the polymer. The polymer solution was transferredto a 5 millimeter NMR tube and measured with a frequency greater than400 MHz, pulse width of 90°, spectral window 15 to −5 ppm, Acquisitiontime of 2.7 seconds, recycle delay of 20 seconds and a total of 16scans.

Integrals are obtained from aromatic proton shift region (baseline of7.59 doublet or 7.90 doublet) and methyl ether shift region of 3.8-3.85singlet.

Where ppm of -OMe is approximated by:

$\frac{\left( {\frac{{Integral}\mspace{14mu} {of}\mspace{14mu} {methyl}}{3}X\; 31.0339} \right)}{\left( {\frac{{Integral}\mspace{14mu} {of}\mspace{14mu} {biphenyl}}{8}X\; 400.4464} \right)} \times 1000000$

TABLE 2 0.5 mol % PCP Charge % Mass (g) Solids (g) mol eq Exam- DCDPS28.00 28.00 0.09751 1.0000 ple 1 BP Salt 88.35 19.862 17.548077 0.076240.7819 BPA Salt 27.85 18.629 5.1881765 0.01906 0.1954 PCP Salt 2.28 50.114 0.00049 0.0050 K2CO3 2 2 0.01447 0.1484 HEGCl 5.16 20 1.0320.00391 0.0401 ODCB 99.758

TABLE 3 1 mol % PCP Charge % Mass BH89 (g) Solids (g) mol eq Exam- DCDPS14 14 0.04875 1.0000 ple 2 BP Salt 44.154 19.862 8.76986748 0.038100.7815 BPA Salt 13.87 18.51 2.567337 0.00943 0.1934 PCP Salt 2.28 50.114 0.00049 0.0100 K2CO3 2 2 0.01447 0.2968 HEGCl 2.57 20 0.5140.00195 0.0400 ODCB 50.909

TABLE 4 2 mol % PCP Charge % Mass EL10 (g) Solids (g) mol eq Exam- DCDPS14.0048 14.0048 0.04877 1.0000 ple 3 BP Salt 43.88 19.862 8.71544560.03787 0.7764 BPA Salt 13.8 18.51 2.55438 0.00938 0.1924 PCP Salt 4.585 0.229 0.00098 0.0200 K2CO3 2.04 2 0.01447 0.2967 HEGCl 4.5352 200.90704 0.00344 0.0705 ODCB 54.389

TABLE 5 4 mol % PCP Charge % Mass EL09 (g) Solids (g) mol eq Exam- DCDPS14.0275 14.0275 0.04885 1.0000 ple 4 BP Salt 43.68 19.862 8.67572160.03769 0.7716 BPA Salt 13.74 18.51 2.543274 0.00934 0.1912 PCP Salt9.19 5 0.4595 0.00196 0.0401 K2CO3 2.1 2.1 0.01447 0.2962 HEGCl 6.299620 1.25992 0.00478 0.0978 ODCB 59.971

TABLE 6 BPA Salt Add (g) % Solids Mass (g) mol eq Example 1 0.589918.629 0.109892 0.00040 0.0041 Example 2 3.032 18.51 0.561223 0.002060.0423 Example 3 3.2082 18.51 0.593838 0.00218 0.0447 Example 4 3.720618.51 0.688683 0.00253 0.0518

Examples 5-14 (Comparative Examples)

The purpose of these Examples was to evaluate commercially availablePPSU polymers for their respective chlorine content and their end groupcontent and other properties. Results for all the examples are shown inTables 7 and 8. Tables 7 and 8 below show how the use of themonofunctional phenoxide affected the polymer's chlorine content, colorstability, and molecular weight retention. Table 7 contains data forsamples prepared by the Analysis 1 method. Table 8 contains data forsamples prepared by the Analysis 2 method.

TABLE 7 Polymer samples as prepared by Analysis 1 (raw pellets, orpolymer in examples) Total Ome MW in Pol- total Cl Cl pol PolymerExample kiloDaltons PDI OH (ppm) Extract total Cl 0.5% PCP 1 55 — — —6632.2 12800 6168 1% PCP 2 55 — 8 — 74.7 1300.0 1225 2% PCP 3 52.6 2.431 — 1621.5 3500.0 1879 4% PCP 4 54.9 2.31 0 — 7889.3 6800.0 −1089 BASFP3010 5 50.9 2.70 6 990 4.5 5050 5046 BASF 94956367J0 6 46.9 2.42 8 45180 132 132 BASF 86663867J0 7 48.6 2.42 6 4421 0 102 102 BASF Ultrason E2010 93419267JO 8 42.9 2.52 — 1869 0 1500 1500 Solvay Udel 9 67.3 3.14 0798 3.2 1700 1697 Solvay M10297T 10 50.7 2.47 9 944 0 3000 3000 SolvayM10082J 11 50.8 2.48 2 1168 2 3120 3118 Solvay Oct. 27, 2007 12 48.32.39 1 862 0 3800 3800 Solvay R5100NT AM667 13 50.6 2.44 0 1054 0 32003200 Solvay R5800 14 48.2 2.44 4 856 0 3500 3500 Solvay R5000 old 1550.6 2.43 2 826 0 3100 3100 Solvay R5500 Black 16 53.9 2.46 2 713 0 32003200 Solvay M07187T 17 47.1 2.50 9 963 1.9 3100 3098.1 Jida PPSU 18 45.32.43 72 0 310 3200 2890 U2 SLT 77-79 19 42.2 2.77 92 — 0 2200 2200

TABLE 8 Polymer samples as prepared by Analysis 2 (veratrole) MW ClExam- kDa Ex- Cl pol Polymer ple (PS eq) DI tract total Cl 0.5% PCP 160.8 2.31 130.0 3620.0 3490 1% PCP 2 56.9 2.18 8.0 3050.0 3042 2% PCP 355.5 2.08 30.0 2600.0 2570 4% PCP 4 54.7 2.17 60.0 970.0 910 BASF P30105 53.6 2.38 9 5300 5291 Solvay M10082J 11 55.3 2.15 0 3100.0 3100 SolvayOct. 27, 2007 12 52.5 2.10 2 3400 3398 Solvay R5100NT 13 54.7 2.08 32780 2777 AM667 Solvay R5800 14 52.6 2.14 4 3200 3196 Solvay R5000 old15 54.0 2.18 10 2440 2430 Solvay R5500 Black 16 53.9 2.46 0 3060.0 3060Solvay M07187T 17 54.8 2.07 0 3180.0 3180 Jida PPSU 18 52.1 2.17 13.02920.0 2907 U2 SLT 77-79 19 45.7 2.46 13 2070 2057

The results show that the use of the monofunctional phenoxideunexpectedly produced a polymer having surprising combination of lowchlorine content, low hydroxyl end group content and that materials madein the inventive examples were methoxy-free, which means that it waspossible to make a poly(aryl ether sulfone) without reactive alkylhalide-containing materials. As such, advantageously, the poly(arylether sulfone) units of formula (I) are methoxy free, which means, inpart, that methyl chloride does not have to be used. The results, asshown in FIG. 1, also show that use of a monofunctional phenoxide isuseful in controlling the molecular weight of the poly(aryl ethersulfone). More particularly, FIG. 1 shows the relationship between theamount of para-cumyl phenol and the weight average molecular weight ofthe poly(aryl ether sulfone). Additionally, FIG. 2 demonstrates thatthat the para-cumyl phenol reduces the amount of chlorine in thepolymer.

Based on these results, (that our poly(aryl ether sulfone had relativelylow hydroxyl groups (an OH content that is more than 0 and less than 50ppm) we can also infer that the polymer has a yellowness index that isless than 120 after an article made from the polymer is exposed to atemperature that is 200° C. in ambient air for 28 days; and the polymerhas a thermal stability factor greater than or equal to 90%.

Example 20

The purpose of this Example was to determine whether our methoxy freepoly(aryl ether sulfone) could be made without Bisphenol-A salt.Laboratory polymerizations were performed by the following procedure. Ina nitrogen atmosphere, a 3-neck 250 milliliter flask was charged withsolid 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone, 5 wt % suspension of p-cumyl phenolsodium salt in o-dichlorobenzene, a suspension of 4,4′-biphenol disodiumsalt in o-dichlorobenzene, solid K₂CO₃ and dry o-dichlorobenzene. Allsuspensions were individually measured for phenoxide content bypotentiometric titration with 0.1N HCl in 50% (v/v) MeOH/H₂O.Additionally attached to the flask was a modified thermometer adapterwith septa, a glass rod with Teflon blade, and a Dean Stark trap withTeflon stopper. Nitrogen was supplied to the flask by a stainless steelneedle through the septum and the stopper replaced by a water-cooledcondenser when placed in a fume hood. Heat was supplied by a temperaturecontrolled oil bath at 200° C. and the contents were azeotropicallydried by removal of o-dichlorobenzene until collected overheads werebelow 20 ppm H₂O by Karl Fischer titration and the desired reactionsolids, typically 25-28% polymer, were reached. A 20 wt % solution ofcatalyst (hexaethylguanadinium chloride) in o-dichlorobenzene, typically4 mol % with respect to dichlorodiphenyl sulfone, was slowly added tothe flask by syringe through the septum. Additional catalyst was addedif the reaction did not initiate. Upon reaction initiation, an exothermand a color change were observed and molecular weight built immediately.

Results

0.5 mol % PCP Charge % Mass (g) Solids (g) mol eq Exam- DCDPS 28.0028.00 0.09751 1.0000 ple 20 BP Salt 110.44 19.862 21.94 0.0953 0.9777BPA Salt 0 na 0 0 0 PCP Salt 2.28 5 0.114 0.00049 0.0050 K2CO3 2 20.01447 0.1484 HEGCl 5.16 20 1.032 0.00391 0.0401 ODCB 99.758

Our results show that Bisphenol-A salt does not need to be present tomethoxy free poly(aryl ether sulfone).

While the invention has been illustrated and described in typicalembodiments, it is not intended to be limited to the details shown,since various modifications and substitutions can be made withoutdeparting in any way from the spirit of the present invention. As such,further modifications and equivalents of the invention herein disclosedmay occur to persons skilled in the art using no more than routineexperimentation, and all such modifications and equivalents are believedto be within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by thefollowing claims. All patents and published articles cited herein areincorporated herein by reference.

1. A poly(aryl ether sulfone) comprising units of formula (I):

wherein Ar¹ is a divalent C₆-C₁₅ aromatic group, Ar² is a divalentC₆-C₁₅ aromatic group, Ar³ is a divalent C₆-C₁₅ aromatic group, and n isgreater than 1; and a terminal group of formula (II) derived from amonofunctional phenoxide

wherein X is a hydrogen atom or an organic substituent having from 1 to20 carbon atoms and wherein the polymer is methoxy free and the polymerhas an OH content greater than 0 and less than 50 ppm, based on polymerweight, a glass transition temperature of 180 to 290° C., a molecularweight of 20,000 to 100,000, and a halogen content of more than 0 andless than 3000 ppm.
 2. The poly(aryl ether sulfone) of claim 1, whereinthe poly(aryl ether sulfone) has a halogen content greater than 0 andless than 2500 ppm.
 3. The poly(aryl ether sulfone) of claim 1, whereinthe poly(aryl ether sulfone) has a halogen content greater than 0 andless than 1500 ppm.
 4. The poly(aryl ether sulfone) of claim 1, whereinthe poly(aryl ether sulfone) has a halogen content greater than 0 andless than 900 ppm.
 5. The poly(aryl ether sulfone) of claim 1, whereinthe poly(aryl ether sulfone) has a halogen content greater than 0 andless than 500 ppm.
 6. The poly(aryl ether sulfone) of claim 1, whereinthe halogen is selected from the group of chlorine, bromine, iodide,fluorine, and combinations thereof.
 7. The poly(aryl ether sulfone) ofclaim 1, wherein the halogen is chlorine.
 8. The poly(aryl ethersulfone) of claim 1, wherein the monofunctional phenoxide is derivedfrom a monofunctional phenol selected from the group consisting ofphenol, p-t-butyl-phenol, m-t-butyl-phenol, 4-hydroxybenzamide,4-phenoxyphenol, 4-hydroxy-N,N-dimethylbenzamide, 4-ethynylphenol,4-tert-butyl-2-methylphenol, 4-(2-phenylpropan-2-yl)phenol,(4-hydroxyphenyl)(phenyl)methanone, methyl 4-hydroxybenzoate,4-(2,4-dimethylheptan-3-yl)phenol, para cumyl phenol, 4-phenyl phenol,para methyl phenol, para nonylphenols, o-t-butyl phenol, hydroxy benzoicacid esters, and combinations thereof.
 9. The poly(aryl ether sulfone)of claim 1, wherein terminal group of formula (II) is present in anamount of 1 mol % to 10 mol %, based on sulfone groups (SO₂) in thepolymer.
 10. The poly(aryl ether sulfone) of claim 1, wherein themonofunctional phenoxide is selected from the group consisting ofphenol, para cumyl phenol, 4-phenyl phenol, and combinations thereof.11. The poly(aryl ether sulfone) of claim 1, wherein an article madefrom the poly(aryl ether sulfone) further has a yellowness index that isless than 120 after an article made from the polymer is exposed to atemperature that is 200° C. in ambient air for 28 days; and the polymerhas a thermal stability factor greater than or equal to 90%. 12-18.(canceled)